OEE Measurement in Press Shops: Six Big Losses Applied to Stamping Lines

OEE—Overall Equipment Effectiveness—was designed for repetitive discrete manufacturing. Stamping press lines fit that description almost perfectly: fixed cycle time, high volume, repeating tooling, measurable scrap. Yet most press shops either skip OEE entirely or measure it wrong, tracking only output count against a theoretical maximum and calling the result “efficiency.”

That approach misses the point. OEE is not a single percentage—it is a diagnostic framework. The number itself is nearly useless. The decomposition into Availability, Performance, and Quality, and further into the Six Big Losses, is where the value is. A press shop running at 65% OEE with low availability has a completely different problem than one at 65% OEE with low quality rate. The corrective action is opposite. Get the decomposition wrong and you spend money on the wrong fix.

This article covers how to instrument OEE correctly for mechanical and hydraulic stamping lines, how to map the Six Big Losses to press-shop-specific events, how to calculate each component from raw data, and how to build a KPI hierarchy that connects shop-floor events to business outcomes. All formulas are shown with worked examples. Engineering managers, production planners, and maintenance leads should be able to implement this directly after reading.

---

What OEE Measures—and Why Press Shops Get It Wrong

OEE was developed by Seiichi Nakamura in the context of TPM (Total Productive Maintenance) and measures how effectively a production asset converts its available time into good parts. The formula is:

OEE = Availability × Performance × Quality

Where:

• Availability (A) — fraction of planned production time the machine actually ran
• Performance (P) — fraction of actual run time producing at ideal cycle rate
• Quality (Q) — fraction of produced parts that meet specification on the first pass

World-class OEE benchmarks vary by industry, but for high-volume stamping lines: ≥ 85% is world-class. Most job shops run 55–70%. Large automotive press lines typically fall in the 70–80% range when measured honestly.

Where Press Shops Go Wrong

Measuring the wrong denominator. Many shops calculate OEE against calendar time (8,760 hours/year). OEE should be calculated against planned production time—shifts scheduled for production, minus approved downtime (planned maintenance, shutdowns, no-order periods). Unplanned gaps within a scheduled shift are losses; planned offline periods are not.

Misclassifying die change as loss. Whether a die change counts as planned or unplanned downtime depends on whether it was scheduled in advance. A planned die change on a clean schedule is excluded from the OEE denominator. An emergency die change due to die failure or scheduling error is a loss.

Ignoring the performance component. Most press shops know their uptime and scrap rate. Very few measure actual stroke rate against design stroke rate during production. A press running at 80% of its rated SPM (strokes per minute) is losing 20% of potential output—but if parts are counted and scrap is low, this loss is invisible without a stroke counter.

Aggregating across dissimilar equipment. A 1,000-ton transfer press and a 60-ton OBI press in the same plant should never be averaged into a single OEE figure. Aggregate only equipment of the same type and tonnage class.

---

OEE Calculation: Formulas, Variables and a Worked Example

Component Formulas

Planned Production Time (PPT)

$PPT = Shift\,Duration - Planned\,Downtime$

Where Planned Downtime includes scheduled maintenance, approved changeovers, and planned breaks excluded from production time.

Availability (A)

$A = \frac{Operating\,Time}{Planned\,Production\,Time} = \frac{PPT - Unplanned\,Downtime}{PPT}$

Ideal Cycle Time (ICT)

$ICT = \frac{1}{Rated\,SPM} \times 60 \quad [seconds\,per\,part]$

For a press rated at 45 SPM: ICT = 60/45 = 1.333 s/part

Performance (P)

$P = \frac{Total\,Parts\,Produced \times ICT}{Operating\,Time}$

Or equivalently:

$P = \frac{Actual\,SPM}{Rated\,SPM}$

Quality (Q)

$Q = \frac{Good\,Parts}{Total\,Parts\,Produced} = \frac{Total\,Parts - Scrap - Rework}{Total\,Parts}$

Note: rework counts as defective for OEE. A part that passes inspection only after a second operation is not a first-pass good part.

OEE

$OEE = A \times P \times Q$

Worked Example — 800-Ton Straight-Side Press, Single Shift

Parameter	Value
Shift duration	480 min
Planned maintenance break	20 min
Planned production time (PPT)	460 min
Unplanned downtime (breakdowns + die jams)	55 min
Operating time	405 min
Rated SPM	18
Total strokes counted	6,480
Total parts produced (2 parts/stroke)	12,960
Scrap parts	194
Rework parts	87
Good parts	12,679

Availability: $A = \frac{405}{460} = 0.880 = 88.0\%$

Ideal Cycle Time: $ICT = \frac{60}{18 \times 2} = 1.667\,s/part$ (Rated at 18 SPM × 2 parts per stroke = 36 parts/min)

Performance: $P = \frac{12,960 \times 1.667/60}{405} = \frac{360}{405} = 0.889 = 88.9\%$

Or in stroke rate terms: 6,480 strokes / 405 min = 16.0 actual SPM → P = 16.0/18 = 88.9%

Quality: $Q = \frac{12,679}{12,960} = 0.978 = 97.8\%$

OEE: $OEE = 0.880 \times 0.889 \times 0.978 = 0.765 = \mathbf{76.5\%}$

This is a healthy result for a large transfer press but leaves a clear target: the 11% performance gap suggests micro-stops or speed reduction during forming. Investigation should focus on feeder synchronization and lubrication system pressure consistency.

---

Mapping the Six Big Losses to Stamping Press Events

The Six Big Losses framework (Nakamura/TPM) categorizes all production losses into three pairs, each corresponding to one OEE component. Below is the mapping with press-shop-specific examples.

Loss Category 1 & 2: Availability Losses

Loss 1 — Breakdown Losses

Unplanned stops exceeding a threshold (typically 10 minutes). In press shops:

• Clutch/brake failure
• Crankshaft bearing seizure
• Hydraulic overload device activation (die crash)
• Coil feeder jam or servo fault
• Control system (PLC) fault requiring reboot

Measurement: Total unplanned downtime minutes per shift per machine.

Target: MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) trending up; MTTR (Mean Time to Repair) trending down.

Loss 2 — Setup and Adjustment Losses

Time from last good part of previous job to first good part of new job. In press shops:

• Die change time (mechanical unclamping, cart transport, reclamping)
• Stroke adjustment (shut height setting)
• Feeder pitch and width adjustment
• First-off inspection and approval time
• Tryout strokes during setup (counted as non-production)

Measurement: Changeover duration per die change event.

Target: SMED analysis; internal vs. external task separation.

Loss Category 3 & 4: Performance Losses

Loss 3 — Minor Stops (Idling Losses)

Stops under the tracking threshold (< 10 minutes), often not logged individually. In press shops:

• Strip misfeed: feeder does not advance, press trips out, operator resets
• Part ejection failure: finished part not clearing the die
• Scrap jam in die area: slug backing up in slug chute
• Safety light curtain nuisance trip
• Lubrication system pressure low warning

Measurement: Stroke counter gap analysis—periods where the press counter is running but strokes per minute drops to zero briefly. Modern tonnage monitors and PLC event logs capture these. Manual tally counters cannot.

Target: Pareto by stop code. Top three stop codes typically account for 70% of minor-stop time.

Loss 4 — Speed Losses (Reduced Cycle Rate)

Press running but at below-rated SPM. Causes:

• Operator-selected reduced speed for monitoring a new die
• Automatic speed reduction triggered by tonnage monitor approaching set limit
• Feeder synchronization issue causing press to wait for strip advance
• Material thickness variation causing hesitation in auto feed
• Lubricant starvation requiring reduced speed to prevent die galling

Measurement: Actual SPM logged per job vs. rated SPM for that die/material combination. Requires stroke counter with timestamps, not just cumulative count.

Loss Category 5 & 6: Quality Losses

Loss 5 — Startup Scrap (Yield Losses)

Scrap produced during setup and warm-up before stable production. In press shops:

• Tryout blanks during die setting and shut height adjustment
• First-off parts rejected due to springback outside tolerance
• Material from end-of-coil segments where thickness variation increases
• Parts produced during lubricant prime-up (first 10–30 strokes)

Measurement: Parts tagged as “setup scrap” vs. production scrap in the quality log.

Loss 6 — Production Defects (Chronic Quality Losses)

Scrap and rework during stable production runs. In press shops:

• Thinning/fracture in deep draw operations (material approaching forming limit)
• Springback variation between coils due to yield strength variation
• Burr height out of tolerance (punch/die clearance worn)
• Wrinkling in blank holder area (BHF set too low)
• Dimensional drift over long runs as die heats up

Measurement: Defect rate per part number per die per coil lot. Coil lot tracking is essential for root-cause analysis—defects often correlate with specific incoming material batches.

---

Step-by-Step OEE Implementation Process

Phase 1: Define Your Measurement Scope (Week 1)

1. Select 2–3 pilot press lines. Choose high-volume lines where improvement value is highest.
2. Define shift schedule and approved planned downtime for each machine.
3. Identify rated SPM for each die/part combination. Pull from die cards or press setup sheets. If this data does not exist, run 10 strokes at stable conditions and measure; do not use nameplate maximum SPM of the press.
4. Define the quality reject classification: scrap (scrapped in-process) vs. rework (returned for secondary operation). Both count as defective for OEE purposes.

Phase 2: Instrument the Lines (Week 2–3)

Minimum instrumentation:

• Stroke counter with shift-reset and timestamp capability
• Downtime log sheet (event, start time, end time, stop code)
• Part count at shift end (from counter or downstream pallet count)
• Scrap tally sheet by defect code

Better instrumentation:

• PLC-logged stop events with code and duration
• Real-time tonnage monitor with data logging (captures die crashes, speed reductions)
• Coil tracking by heat/lot number (links quality defects to material)
• Automatic stroke rate trending (PLC or standalone counter)

Best-in-class:

• MES integration: automatic OEE calculation per shift, per machine, per part number
• Edge device capturing 100ms-resolution press cycle data
• Automatic feeder fault classification

Phase 3: Collect Baseline Data (Weeks 4–7)

Run minimum four weeks of data collection before drawing conclusions. Two weeks is insufficient to separate systematic losses from random variation. Track at the shift level, not the day level—OEE variation between day and night shifts is a key diagnostic.

Phase 4: Calculate and Decompose (Week 8)

For each machine and shift:

1. Calculate A, P, Q individually
2. Calculate OEE
3. Rank the six loss categories by minutes lost
4. Pareto the top loss categories

The Pareto step is the most important. A classic error is immediately targeting the bottom OEE number. Target the largest individual loss category first, regardless of which machine it is on.

Phase 5: Set Targets and Assign Owners (Week 8–9)

Assign each loss category to a functional owner:

• Breakdown losses → Maintenance
• Setup losses → Production Planning + Toolroom
• Minor stops → Production + Toolroom
• Speed losses → Process Engineering
• Startup scrap → Toolroom + Process Engineering
• Production defects → Quality + Process Engineering

Set 90-day improvement targets per category, not per machine OEE. OEE will improve as losses are reduced; targeting OEE directly leads to gaming the measurement.

---

OEE Benchmarks: Press Shop Comparison by Equipment Type

Press Type	Typical OEE Range	Primary Loss Driver	Key Improvement Lever
High-speed blanking line (> 100 SPM)	60–75%	Minor stops, speed loss	Feeder precision, slug clearance design
4-post hydraulic forming press	65–78%	Setup time, breakdown	Die cart system, hydraulic PM schedule
800–1,500 ton transfer press	70–82%	Speed loss, startup scrap	Tonnage margin, die temperature management
Progressive die stamping (< 200 ton)	55–70%	Setup time, production defects	SMED, strip detection sensors
Servo press line (any tonnage)	75–88%	Startup scrap, minor stops	Motion program optimization, feeder sync
Fine blanking press	58–72%	Setup losses, production defects	Die grinding interval, in-process gauging

OEE for fine blanking and hydraulic presses is inherently lower than for high-speed mechanical lines because setup time per run is longer and the process window is tighter. Comparing fine blanking OEE to progressive die OEE is not meaningful.

---

Common OEE Measurement Mistakes in Stamping — and How to Fix Them

1. Using shift production count instead of stroke count for performance calculation.

Production count per shift depends on operators restarting after every minor stop. If an operator lets the press cycle idle for 30 minutes before logging a stop, those 30 minutes vanish from both performance and availability calculations. Stroke counters with timestamps do not lie. If you don’t have a stroke counter, install one before measuring OEE.

2. Excluding die change from OEE measurement because “it’s scheduled.”

A die change that happens within a planned production shift reduces available production time. Even if it is on the schedule, it consumes capacity. Planned die changes should be tracked separately as “scheduled changeover time” for SMED analysis, but they must still reduce the numerator of Availability unless you define them as planned downtime outside your OEE denominator. Be consistent: pick one convention and apply it across all machines.

3. Not adjusting rated SPM per die.

A 200-ton press may be rated at 120 SPM by the manufacturer. But a deep-draw die on that press may require 30 SPM maximum due to material flow time and lubrication constraints. Using 120 SPM as the ideal cycle time produces a performance figure of 25%—meaningless and demoralizing. The rated SPM must come from the approved process sheet for each die/material combination.

4. Treating all scrap the same.

Startup scrap and chronic production scrap have completely different root causes. Mixing them produces a quality rate that gives no actionable direction. Tag every reject at the time it is produced: setup scrap (before first good part), chronic production scrap (during stable run), end-of-coil scrap (last 5% of coil). Pareto by category, then by defect code within each category.

5. Measuring at the machine level only, ignoring line balance.

In a linked press line (transfer press + downstream straightener/stacker or robotic line), the slowest station determines line output. An OEE measurement on the press alone misses bottleneck losses in the peripheral equipment. Measure OEE at the line level (output at the final station vs. capacity at the bottleneck station).

6. Reporting weekly averages before building daily granularity.

Averaging OEE across an entire week hides the day-night shift gap, hides Monday-morning startup losses, and hides end-of-week fatigue effects. Always have shift-level data available before computing weekly roll-ups. A weekly average of 72% might be composed of Monday 55%, Tuesday–Thursday 75–78%, Friday 65%. Those patterns are actionable. The average is not.

7. Not benchmarking OEE per part number.

OEE varies significantly between part numbers run on the same machine. A simple stamping with 100-year-old tooling runs at 85%. A complex draw part with marginal tooling runs at 55%. Plant-level OEE hides this. Break down OEE by part number to target die-specific improvements.

---

Industry Applications: How Automotive, Appliance and HVAC Manufacturers Use OEE in Press Shops

Automotive Body Panel Production

Tier-1 automotive suppliers typically run 4,000–8,000-ton tandem press lines for body panels. OEE measurement here is line-level, not machine-level. A five-press tandem line is treated as a single system; the line OEE is calculated based on output at the last press vs. the rated cycle time of the bottleneck press (usually the first press in sequence, which performs the deepest draw).

Key OEE drivers in automotive body panel production:

• Die try-out time at start of production run (startup scrap)
• Coil-end splice handling (the splice zone is typically scrapped, adding to yield loss)
• Tandem press synchronization: if press 3 faults, all five presses stop (availability loss cascades)
• Visual inspection cycle time at line end (can throttle line to below rated SPM)

Automotive OEE targets from Tier-1 suppliers in Germany and Japan: line OEE of 78–83% on high-volume platforms.

Home Appliance Manufacturing

BSH, Arçelik, Whirlpool, and similar manufacturers run high-speed progressive die lines for inner drum parts, door panels, and structural brackets. Typical line speed: 40–80 SPM on 200–400-ton presses.

OEE challenges in appliance stamping:

• High product variety: many part numbers per press, frequent die changes
• Setup loss dominates: changeover frequency 3–8 times per shift on flexible lines
• Die cleanliness: forming lubricant residue on parts triggers quality failures in downstream assembly welding
• Material mix: DC04, DC06 deep-draw steels alongside galvanized grades on the same press with different clearance requirements

Improvement path: SMED to reduce changeover below 15 minutes, standardized die height to eliminate shut-height adjustment, in-die part detection sensors to eliminate startup scrap from strip misfeed.

HVAC and White Goods Compressor Parts

Compressor shell halves and bracket stampings use large-bed hydraulic presses (200–600 ton) running at 4–12 SPM. OEE for these lines is lower due to long cycle times and complex tool changes, but the value per stroke is high.

Primary OEE losses: hydraulic system downtime (pump, seal failures), long setup (hydraulic press shut height adjustment is slower than mechanical), springback-related rework in high-strength bracket stampings.

---

FAQ: OEE in Stamping Press Shops

Q: What is a realistic OEE target for a job shop stamping press?

A job shop with high product mix and short runs (< 5,000 parts per run) should target 55–65% OEE initially. Setup losses will dominate and will not drop quickly without significant investment in quick-die-change infrastructure. For a job shop, tracking Changeover Efficiency separately from OEE is often more useful than OEE alone. World-class job shop stamping OEE rarely exceeds 70% due to inherent setup time losses across many part numbers.

Q: How do we handle planned maintenance in the OEE calculation?

If a machine is scheduled offline for planned maintenance during a shift—and that time was planned in advance and reflected in the production schedule—it should be removed from the Planned Production Time denominator. The OEE is then calculated only against the remaining scheduled production time. If planned maintenance happens but was not reflected in the production schedule (reactive planning), it counts as Availability loss.

Q: Can OEE be applied to hydraulic presses the same way as mechanical presses?

Yes, with one important adjustment: hydraulic presses typically have a variable cycle time depending on the part (press force and return speed are programmable). The rated cycle time (ideal cycle time) must be the programmed cycle time for that specific job, not the maximum possible cycle time of the press. Document the approved cycle time per die on the die card and use that value for Performance calculation.

Q: What SPM data source is most reliable for OEE calculation?

PLC-level stroke counter data is the most reliable. The PLC registers every crankshaft revolution (for mechanical presses) or every completed cylinder cycle (for hydraulic presses). This is timestamped and cannot be reset by operators. Proximity switches on the slide or crankshaft position are the physical sensor. Secondary options: standalone stroke counters hardwired to the press safety circuit (these capture every completed stroke). Manual count via shift production log is the least reliable—it typically undercounts minor stops.

Q: How often should OEE be calculated and reviewed?

Data should be captured at the shift level (every 8 hours). OEE should be reviewed at three frequencies: daily (shift leaders review last shift’s data, identify today’s priorities), weekly (production manager reviews week’s trend, identifies chronic losses for engineering attention), monthly (management review of trend against targets, resource allocation for corrective action projects). Real-time OEE displays on the shop floor are useful motivationally but should not replace the structured weekly review.

Q: Our OEE is 65%. Which loss should we attack first?

Do not attack by overall OEE level. Decompose into A × P × Q, then break each into the relevant Six Big Losses categories, calculate minutes lost per category per week, and rank by total time lost. The largest time-loss category is the first priority regardless of which OEE component it falls under. In most press shops seeing 65% OEE for the first time, setup losses (Loss 2) and minor stops (Loss 3) are the largest combined losses. But do not assume—measure and decompose first.

Q: Should we include trial runs and new die tryouts in OEE?

Production trial runs on new dies should be excluded from OEE calculation if they are formally scheduled as development runs, not production. Include them only if they produce saleable parts or consume production capacity committed to customer orders. Die tryout departments often track their own efficiency metrics separately from production OEE.

---

JSON-LD FAQ Schema

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is a realistic OEE target for a job shop stamping press?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "A job shop with high product mix and short runs should target 55–65% OEE initially. Setup losses dominate and will not drop quickly without quick-die-change infrastructure. World-class job shop stamping OEE rarely exceeds 70% due to inherent setup time losses across many part numbers."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How do we handle planned maintenance in the OEE calculation?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "If a machine is scheduled offline for planned maintenance during a shift and that time was planned in advance, remove it from the Planned Production Time denominator. If planned maintenance happens but was not reflected in the production schedule, it counts as Availability loss."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Can OEE be applied to hydraulic presses the same way as mechanical presses?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Yes, with one adjustment: the rated cycle time must be the programmed cycle time for that specific job on a hydraulic press, not the maximum possible cycle time. Document the approved cycle time per die on the die card and use that value for Performance calculation."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What SPM data source is most reliable for OEE calculation in press shops?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "PLC-level stroke counter data is the most reliable — it is timestamped and cannot be reset by operators. Secondary option: standalone stroke counters hardwired to the press safety circuit. Manual count via shift production log is the least reliable and typically undercounts minor stops."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How often should OEE be calculated and reviewed in a stamping press shop?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Data should be captured at shift level. Review daily (shift leaders), weekly (production manager reviews trends), and monthly (management reviews against targets). Real-time OEE displays are useful motivationally but should not replace structured weekly reviews."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Our press shop OEE is 65%. Which loss should we attack first?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Do not attack by OEE level. Decompose into A × P × Q, break each into the Six Big Losses categories, calculate minutes lost per category per week, and rank by total time lost. The largest time-loss category is the first priority. In most press shops at 65% OEE, setup losses and minor stops are the largest combined losses—but measure first, do not assume."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Should new die tryout runs be included in production OEE?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Exclude formally scheduled development trial runs from production OEE. Include them only if they produce saleable parts or consume capacity committed to customer orders. Tryout departments often track their own efficiency metrics separately."
      }
    }
  ]
}

---

Conclusion

OEE measurement in press shops is not an IT project—it is an engineering management practice. The calculation is straightforward once you define your denominators correctly (planned production time, rated SPM per die, first-pass quality). The value comes from the Six Big Losses decomposition: breaking a single percentage into six actionable categories that each have a functional owner and a specific set of tools to address them.

The most common failure mode is collecting OEE data without acting on it. A weekly OEE report that goes into a spreadsheet and gets discussed briefly in a shift meeting changes nothing. OEE data drives improvement only when it is decomposed to loss category, assigned to a specific owner with a specific 30–90 day target, and reviewed against that target with engineering rigor—root-cause analysis, corrective action, verification.

For most press shops starting from scratch, the sequence is: instrument stroke counting first, then track downtime with stop codes, then classify scrap by category. Do not try to implement all three simultaneously. Get Availability right first—it usually has the most impact and requires the least data sophistication. Then add Performance tracking. Then refine Quality classification.

A 10-percentage-point OEE improvement on a 500-ton press running three shifts corresponds to roughly 240 additional production hours per year—hours that cost nothing except the discipline to measure and act.

---

Demirezen Engineering: OEE Implementation and Press Line Optimization

Demirezen Engineering provides press line productivity analysis, OEE system design, and stamping process optimization for manufacturers in the Middle East, North Africa, and global markets. Our team has direct hands-on experience designing OEE measurement frameworks for high-volume stamping lines and implementing press shop KPI systems from sensor-level instrumentation to management reporting.

If your press shop is running below target or you are building an OEE measurement system from the ground up, contact us directly:

WhatsApp: +90 543 341 6183 Website: demirezenengineering.com

---

Internal Links

• Pres Hattında OEE Ölçümü (Türkçe)
• Transfer Die vs Progressive Die: Decision Framework for High-Volume Stamping
• Die Tryout Process: Steps, Documentation and First Article Approval
• Coil Feeding Systems for Stamping Lines
• C-Frame vs H-Frame Mechanical Press: Deflection, Rigidity and Application Guide

---

Reference Sources

1. Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance (JIPM) — TPM and Six Big Losses framework: jipm.or.jp
2. Lean Production / Industry Standard OEE Definitions — OEE Industry Standard definitions and benchmarks: oee.com
3. AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group) — Production Part Approval Process and process control standards for automotive stamping: aiag.org

---

Suggested Images and Diagrams

1. OEE Waterfall Chart — Visual showing planned production time → available time → net operating time → fully productive time, with each loss category labeled. ALT: “OEE waterfall diagram for stamping press showing availability, performance and quality losses”

2. Six Big Losses Mapping Diagram — Press-shop-specific event examples under each loss category (tree diagram format). ALT: “Six Big Losses categories mapped to stamping press events including breakdowns, die changes, minor stops and scrap types”

3. Stroke Counter Trend Chart — Time-series chart of actual SPM vs. rated SPM over a production shift, showing micro-stop gaps and speed reduction periods. ALT: “Stamping press stroke rate chart comparing actual versus rated SPM with minor stop identification”

4. OEE Pareto by Loss Category — Bar chart of minutes lost per Six Big Losses category for a sample press line, illustrating Pareto prioritization. ALT: “Pareto chart of OEE losses in a press shop by Six Big Losses category”

5. Die Change Time Breakdown — Gantt-style diagram of individual tasks in a die change (removing old die, cart positioning, new die installation, height setting, first-off inspection), showing internal vs. external elements for SMED analysis. ALT: “Stamping press die change time breakdown for SMED analysis showing internal and external tasks”